We applied the trained random forest models to the 50% data withheld for testing to evaluate its performance in classifying bat activity. Similarly, we applied random forest models to the bird and human activity dataset after calculating the same predictor variables as for the bats. We first calculated the true positive rate (TPR) as the ratio of correctly identified incidents by comparing the observed data with the activity class attributed by the trained random forest models for all dataset types (i.e., human activity dataset, woodpecker, and bat video sequences). Next, we calculated the models’ F-score (F1) using the Caret package (Kuhn, 2008). Data and code are stored here.
To the files


AuthorsGottwald, Jannis
LicenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0
show more


NameFormatSizeChecksum (MD5)
validation.tar .tar2.561Gb3900cc44e5af7d907debfa54aaf8358d
license_CC-BY-4.0.txt .txt18.21Kb380b31767eeb6303e3bc300d8846f180
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

* Displayed version